Home

What Is The NOPR 

NOPR Forms 

Info For PET Facilities 

Info For Referring 
Physicians


Info For Patients

PET Facility Registration

Registered Users

Frequently Asked
Questions


Educational Materials

News

Monthly Status Report

Contact Us


Ineligible Indications
  June 11, 2009

NOPR Update: SNM Q&A for PET Medicare Clarification SPN and MPN

Because of a recently increased number of questions regarding confusion of Medicare coverage of PET for evaluation of patients with solitary pulmonary nodules or multiple pulmonary nodules, the Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM) has recently posted a new coding Q&A addressing this topic (see below and URL) We hope information is helpful to you.

http://interactive.snm.org/index.cfm?PageID=8734&RPID=1995

SPN and MPN PET Medicare Coverage Created: May 28, 2009

Question

We are confused about the Medicare PET coverage for lung masses, solitary pulmonary nodules and multiple pulmonary nodules. Can you please clarify? In the past we were billing with diagnosis codes 518.89 or 793.1 prior to biopsy when a biopsy was not available or medically feasible. Can you tell us which ICD 9 indications the Medicare contractors will accept as payable?

Answer

Deciding whether or not to do a PET scan and whether or not it is covered requires medical judgment, as well as compliance judgment. Where PET fits into the continuum in the evaluation of patients with lung nodules depends on many factors including the full clinical history, risk factors for lung cancer, history of prior cancers, the CT appearance of nodule(s), etc. Thus, the answer rests on the specific clinical question being posed by the referring MD. Moreover, the question should be well thought out before ordering an expensive diagnostic test.

To address the questions, we will give a few examples, but these are by no means all of the possibilities. Each of these examples is included under the current Medicare coverage for "initial treatment strategy".

As a general rule, it is usually preferable to get a tissue diagnosis before launching a complex imaging evaluation of a suspected cancer anywhere in the body. This is not always possible, however, and not always the best first step.

In the case of a single nodule or mass thought highly likely to be a primary lung cancer, PET is often ordered before biopsy, less as a test to diagnose cancer, but rather to stage the cancer. If PET demonstrates other lesions (e.g., supraclavicular or mediastinal nodes), it may be far easier to biopsy these than the index lesion in the lung.

In the case of an indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule, PET is done for diagnosis (to determine whether the lesion is more likely benign or malignant). If PET is negative, the patient typically does not undergo biopsy. In other words, PET helps in this situation to avoid an invasive diagnostic procedure. The situation is similar with an indeterminate biopsy; if PET is negative; the patient is typically followed and avoids an even more invasive diagnostic procedure (resection by VATS or thoracotomy).

The situation with multiple pulmonary nodules also involves several scenarios.

If one or more of the nodules appear spiculated and the patient is a smoker, such that multifocal adenocarcinoma of the lung is the most likely diagnosis, we would view this as an instance of "Lung Cancer: Diagnosis", which is definitely a Medicare-covered indication. Depending on which ICD-9 codes your carrier accepts for a case like this as indicating medical necessity, you may need to be prepared to appeal for payment. Thus, extra care in documentation of medical necessity in the PET report is advised.

If the multiple nodules appear round and smooth and there is significant clinical concern for metastatic disease to the lungs from an unknown primary tumor, PET previously would have had to be performed under NOPR as "Diagnosis: Unknown Primary". This is now a Medicare-covered indication. The same proviso as above regarding ICD-9 codes to document medical necessity applies. We repeat extra care to document medical necessity in the PET report is advised.

Each Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) will be accessing and developing its own list of covered ICD-9 codes based on the April 3, 2009 National Coverage Determination (NCD) for PET. The current situation is in flux, because the CMS transmittal to the carriers pursuant to the recent NCD has not yet been issued, as of the date of this Q&A. The Medicare contractors will eventually be developing new lists of ICD-9 codes to support medical necessity. There will likely be much dialog between providers, medical specialties and contractors before the LCDs are finalized.

Please visit here (http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewdecisionmemo.asp?from2=viewdecisionmemo.asp&id=218&) to see the final CMS PET NCD.

Disclaimer

The opinions referenced are those of the members of the SNM Coding and Reimbursement Committee and their consultants based on their coding experience. They are based on the commonly used codes in Nuclear Medicine, which are not all inclusive. Always check with your local insurance carriers as policies vary by region. The final decision for the coding of a procedure must be made by the physician considering regulations of insurance carriers and any local, state or federal laws that apply to the physicians practice. The SNM and its representatives disclaim any liability arising from the use of these opinions.




June 3, 2009

NOPR Update: Clarification to Covered Indications Table for Melanoma

The entry for “Melanoma (172)” in the Indications Table on the NOPR Web site and in Appendix III of the Operations Manual has been changed to specify “Melanoma of Skin (172)”. This indication was clarified to avoid confusion since for Subsequent Treatment Strategy, cutaneous melanoma is covered and nasopharyngeal melanoma is covered (the latter is considered as a head and neck cancer), but ocular melanoma and vulvar/vaginal melanoma must be done under NOPR.




May 20, 2009

NOPR Update: NOPR 2006 Data Changes Due by May 31, 2009

NOPR will submit its final set of data for cases entered under NOPR 2006 (cases entered prior to April 4, 2009) to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in June. All requests for changes to data on submitted cases (misspellings, typos, etc.) must be submitted to pet_registry@phila.acr.org by May 31, 2009.




May 6, 2009

NOPR Update: Change to Indications Table and Appendix III of the Operations Manual

We have discovered that the General Note at the bottom of the table entitled “CANCERS AND INDICATIONS ELIGIBLE FOR ENTRY IN THE NOPR” (Appendix III in the Operations Manual) was incorrect. The General Note should have read as follows:

GENERAL NOTE

PET imaging of the brain with CPT code 78608 is covered for those cancers and indications designated by “C” in the table above and is covered only under NOPR for those cancers and indications indicated by “NOPR” in the table above.

Please see http://www.cancerpetregistry.org/indications.htm for the updated indications table.




April 10, 2009

NOPR Update: Guidance Regarding Transition Period Billing

On Friday April 3, 2009, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released their final PET National Coverage Determination (NCD) that became effective on Monday April 6, 2009. CMS will not likely publish Medicare Claims Guidance until later during the month of April. Guidance regarding billing of PET claims during the transition period has been provided by the Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM). For more information please go to: http://interactive.snm.org/index.cfm?PageID=8612 .

In addition, the SNM will be hosting a 90-minute webinar, "Changes to PET Coverage: Including a Review of the NOPR Sequel" on April 27, 2009 to help providers understand the final PET NCD and the new NOPR requirements. For more information regarding registration please go to: https://interactive.snm.org/index.cfm?PageID=8504&RPID=10 .




April 6, 2009

CMS News: Medicare Expands Coverage of PET Scans as Cancer Diagnostic Tool (4/6/09)

CMS issued a press release on April 6, 2009 concerning its April 3, 2009 decision to expand coverage for PET scans as a cancer diagnostic tool under its Coverage with Evidence Development project. CMS cited the work of the NOPR in its decision to modify its 2005 coverage policy. “This decision is the first time that CMS has reconsidered a coverage policy based on new evidence developed under the CED program.” <http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?Counter=3436&intNumPerPage=10&checkDate=&checkKey=&srchType=1&numDays=3500&srchOpt=0&srchData=&keywordType=All&chkNewsType=1%2C+2%2C+3%2C+4%2C+5&intPage=&showAll=&pYear=&year=&desc=&cboOrder=date>

As NOPR announced on April 3, 2009, CMS has expanded coverage for the use of PET for initial treatment strategy evaluation (formerly diagnosis and initial staging) of patients with nearly all cancer types, and also will allow for use of PET in subsequent treatment strategy evaluations (formerly restaging, detection of suspected recurrence and treatment monitoring) for an expanded number of cancer types. However, for certain other cancers, the use of PET in initial treatment strategy evaluations and, particularly, in subsequent treatment strategy evaluations will still be covered by CMS only if patients are enrolled in an approved clinical trial or registry such as the NOPR




April 3, 2009

NOPR Update: Changes to NOPR Patient Registration and Data Entry Procedures

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced a new coverage policy for oncologic PET scans <
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewdecisionmemo.asp?id=218>. NOPR has updated its data collection procedures to comply with this directive. Under this new policy, CMS has expanded coverage for the use of PET for initial treatment strategy evaluation (formerly diagnosis and initial staging) of patients with nearly all cancer types, and also will allow for use of PET in subsequent treatment strategy evaluations (formerly restaging, detection of suspected recurrence and treatment monitoring) for an expanded number of cancer types. However, for certain other cancers, the use of PET in initial treatment strategy evaluations and, particularly, in subsequent treatment strategy evaluations will still be covered by CMS only if patients are enrolled in an approved clinical trial or registry. The NOPR has obtained CMS approval to continue its data collection to allow for coverage of PET scans performed for these cancers and indications under this successor “coverage with evidence development” (CED) program. In compliance with the new coverage policy, NOPR will launch a new version of the registry on Monday, April 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM ET. Access to the new registry will be through the current web site at http://www.cancerPETregistry.org. The new registry portal is identified as NOPR 2009 and the old registry portal is identified as NOPR 2006. The following guidelines are provided to assist you in this transition:

New Facilities and New Patient Registrations
  • All new patients will be registered in the new database (NOPR 2009).
  • New facility registrations will only be accepted via the new database (NOPR 2009).
  • Most of the data collection questions are the same or similar to the questions in the original registry, but there are some important differences, especially for PET studies being done for treatment monitoring. On Monday April 6th, facilities should download and review the new Operations Manual and new case report forms (CRFs), and the slightly revised Patient and Referring Physician Information Sheets (consent forms) that are available on the NOPR Web site. The new Pre-PET Form and Patient Information Sheet is available now at <http://nrdr.acr.org/PETRegistry/prePETwithConsent.pdf>
  • The new registry will require the referring physician to sign both the Pre-PET and the Post-PET forms submitted for each patient attesting to the accuracy of the data on the forms.
Previously Registered Patients
  • Data for patients previously entered into the NOPR will continue to be stored and accessed through the 2006 Version.
  • Patients currently registered in NOPR who had their PET performed on or before April 3, 2009 will remain in the current registry database (NOPR 2006) and their data will continue to be entered in that database. This will allow for data collection on open cases and report generation on all cases with scan completion dates prior to April 3, 2009.
  • For patients registered in the current database (NOPR 2006) who did not have PET performed on or before April 3, 2009, the case registration should be cancelled and the patient should be re-registered in the new database (NOPR 2009). To be clear, the PET facility is responsible for canceling and re-registering these patients. Credits that are applied to accounts in NOPR 2006 after April 3, 2009 will be transferred to the facility’s account in NOPR 2009.
Escrowed Funds
  • All facility information and escrow balances will be transferred from the original database (NOPR 2006) to the new database (NOPR 2009). Facility staff who have been entering patients on the existing database will be able to enter new patients on the new database immediately.
OUTLINE OF NEW CMS COVERAGE POLICY (for further detail see the Indications Table summarizing coverage) <http://nrdr.acr.org/PETRegistry/indications.pdf>.

Initial Treatment Strategy

PET performed as part of an evaluation for determination of an initial treatment strategy (formerly diagnosis and initial staging) is covered by CMS as an approved indication for PET with specific exceptions

PET is explicitly not covered by CMS for initial treatment strategy evaluation for three specific cancer types/indications: 1) diagnosis and axillary nodal staging of breast cancer; 2) assessment of regional lymph nodes in melanoma; and 3) diagnosis of prostate cancer and initial staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

However, PET for initial treatment strategy evaluation is covered only with participation in the NOPR for certain patients with suspected or proven cervical cancer and for patients with suspected or proven leukemia.

Note, PET is covered only in clinical situations in which (1) the PET results may assist in avoiding an invasive diagnostic procedure, or in which (2) the PET results may assist in determining the optimal anatomical location to perform an invasive diagnostic procedure. In general, for most solid tumors, a tissue diagnosis is made prior to doing a PET scan and therefore the scan is performed for staging rather than diagnosis.

PET is not covered as a screening test (i.e., testing patients without specific signs and symptoms of disease).

Subsequent Treatment Strategy

PET is also a CMS-covered service when used in subsequent treatment strategy evaluation (formerly restaging, detection of suspected recurrence, and treatment monitoring) of patients with the following cancers: breast, cervix, colorectal, esophageal, head and neck, lymphoma, melanoma, myeloma, non-small cell lung, ovary, and thyroid. For all other cancers, PET coverage for subsequent treatment strategy evaluation requires participation in this registry.

PET is covered for restaging and detection of suspected recurrences:
  1. after completion of treatment for the purpose of detecting residual disease; or
  2. for detecting suspected recurrence or metastasis; or
  3. to determine the extent of a known recurrence:
  4. if it could potentially replace one or more conventional imaging studies when it is expected that conventional study information is insufficient for the clinical management of the patient.
  5. Restaging applies to testing after a course of treatment is completed, and is covered subject to the conditions above.
Comment: As noted above, PET is not covered as a screening test (i.e., testing patients without specific signs and symptoms of disease) and thus is not covered for surveillance of patients treated for cancer in whom there is no clinical reason to suspect recurrent disease.
Treatment monitoring refers to use of PET to monitor tumor response to treatment during the planned course of therapy (i.e., when a change in therapy is anticipated).
Comment: As an example, PET performed under NOPR may be covered for monitoring after 2 or 3 of a planned 6 cycles of chemotherapy in a patient considered not to be responding as expected.



April 2, 2009

NOPR Update: NOPR Announcement Regarding Coverage Change Implementation

In January 2009, CMS proposed significant changes regarding Medicare's coverage of PET imaging, including those PET studies currently covered only with participation in the Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) program managed by the NOPR (see
http://www3.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewdraftdecisionmemo.asp?id=218). It is expected that Medicare will publish its final National Coverage Determination (NCD) within the next few days and the new policy will become effective on the day it is published.

According to the proposed decision memorandum, Medicare will provide coverage on a routine basis for many of the cancers and indications now reimbursed under NOPR. However, other cancers and indications would be covered only under a successor CED program that would need to be somewhat different than the current NOPR program.

NOPR has developed a successor program, NOPR 2009, that we believe will meet the requirements of the new NCD. However, until the new NCD is published, we will not be able to verify that the new NOPR program has been approved by CMS as a new CED program.

Accordingly, when the new NCD is published NOPR will:
  • Keep the current site operational until midnight (ET) on the publication date for sites to register and enter pre-PET data for cases that were scanned earlier on that day.
  • Send out a broadcast announcement to all NOPR users outlining the changes in NOPR and in Medicare coverage for PET.
  • At midnight ET, close the current NOPR web site for new entries and temporarily close it for data collection.
  • Within 12 to 72 hours, depending upon when the NCD is published, open a new site (NOPR 2009) for entry of cases eligible under the new criteria, and re-open the old site (NOPR 2006) for data entry on cases still in progress under the old program. Note that the planned successor CED program (NOPR 2009) will require the use of revised pre- and post-PET forms to be completed by the referring physician and slightly revised Patient and Referring Physician Information Sheets (consent forms).
Since we do not know when the NCD will be published, we recommend that sites adopt the following procedures:
  • For the next few days, wait until a patient appears for his/her scan to register the patient in the current NOPR system. [ Whether a patient will need to be registered and have data collected in the NOPR 2006 system or the NOPR 2009 system depends on the date of service (i.e., the date of the PET scan). In other words, if a patient is registered in NOPR 2006, but not scanned until after NOPR 2009 is operational, the old registration would need to be cancelled and the patient would need to be re-registered in the new system.]
  • If a patient must be scanned while NOPR is closed for patient entry, complete the paper version of the case registration form and the new Pre-PET Form and fax them to NOPR Headquarters.
  • As soon as the registry reopens, download the new versions of the case report forms, Patient Information Sheet, Referring Physician Information Sheet, and Operations Manual from the Web site.
  • Begin using the new forms for cases entered into NOPR 2009 and continue using the old forms for cases previously entered into NOPR 2006 (for which all data collection has not yet been completed).
Although the new coverage policy will be effective on the day it is published, Medicare Contractors are allowed at least 30 days to implement required changes in their claims processing software, and in their local coverage policies.




February 20, 2009

NOPR Update: Update on Future PET Coverage under NOPR

This is an update regarding changes that are underway regarding Medicare's coverage of PET imaging under NOPR. On January 6, 2009, CMS proposed significant changes to current coverage (see
http://www3.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewdraftdecisionmemo.asp?id=218). Under the proposal, Medicare will provide coverage on a routine basis for many of the indications now reimbursed under NOPR. However, other indications would be covered only under a successor Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) program which likely will be somewhat different than the current NOPR program.

Medicare will publish its final coverage statement on or before April 6, 2009. The new policy becomes effective on the day it is published. The NOPR believes it should be possible to have a successor CED program in place when the NCD is published. However, until the day the new NCD is published, we will not know the details of the final coverage policy, whether any new codes or modifiers must be used for claims, nor whether a successor NOPR program has been cleared by CMS.

Although the new coverage policy will be effective on the day it is published, Medicare Contractors are allowed at least 30 days to implement required changes in their claims processing software, and in their local coverage policies.

Each site should closely monitor NOPR communications, and be prepared for coverage changes on the date the final coverage decision is issued. In the past, when major coverage or fee schedule changes occurred, some providers have held claims until their contractors have implemented the new edits. As soon as additional information becomes available, we will make it available to participating PET facilities via these e-mail announcements and the NOPR website.




January 07, 2009

NOPR Update: CMS released their preliminary PET coverage Decision

On Tuesday, January 6, 2009, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released their preliminary PET Coverage Decision in response to a written request submitted by the NOPR (National Oncologic PET Registry) asking that it reconsider the current National Coverage decision on FDG-PET to provide coverage for diagnosis, staging and restaging for all cancers and end the data collection requirements for these indications. The request was made based upon analysis of the NOPR data for which key results were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in May 2008.

The NOPR is reviewing the proposed coverage decision carefully and will communicate information as it becomes available to participating PET facilities about its potential impact on the continuation and type of data collection to be performed by the NOPR. For now, NOPR operations continue unchanged.

There are two critical draft decisions that are included:

1). CMS Expands Coverage for the Initial Treatment Strategy

CMS proposes that the evidence is adequate to determine that the results of FDG PET imaging are useful in determining the appropriate initial treatment strategy for patients with suspected solid tumors. Therefore, CMS will cover one FDG PET study for patients who have solid tumors that are biopsy proven or strongly suspected based on other diagnostic testing when the patient’s physician determines FDG PET is critical to determine the location and/or extent of the tumor for the following therapeutic purposes:

  • To determine whether or not the beneficiary is an appropriate candidate for an invasive diagnostic or therapeutic procedure; or
  • To determine the optimal anatomic location for an invasive procedure; or
  • To determine the anatomic extent of tumor when the recommended anti-tumor treatment reasonably depends on the extent of the tumor.
2). CMS Continues to Restrict Coverage on the Subsequent Treatment Strategy and Proposes New Coverage Framework.

CMS proposes, for tumors other than the nine currently cover tumors: breast, cervix, colorectal, esophagus, head and neck, lymphoma, melanoma, non-small cell lung, and thyroid, that the available evidence is not adequate to determine that FDG PET imaging improves physician decision making in the determination of subsequent anti-tumor treatment strategy.

Also, CMS proposes to transition the current framework- diagnosis, staging, restaging and monitoring- into the initial treatment and subsequent treatment strategy framework while maintaining current coverage. See the below Appendix A of the draft decision for a summation of the effects of these changes.

Appendix A: Effect of Coverage Changes on Oncologic Uses of FDG PET

 

Current Framework

 

Proposed Framework

Solid Tumor Type

Diagnosis

Staging

Restaging

Monitoring

Initial Treatment *

Subsequent Treatment **

Brain

CED

CED

CED

CED

Cover

CED

Breast (female and male)

N/C

1

Cover

Cover

1

Cover

Cervix

CED

Cover

Cover

CED

Cover

Cover

Colorectal

Cover

Cover

Cover

CED

Cover

Cover

Esophagus

Cover

Cover

Cover

CED

Cover

Cover

Head & Neck (not thyroid or CNS)

Cover

Cover

Cover

CED

Cover

Cover

Lymphoma

Cover

Cover

Cover

CED

Cover

Cover

Melanoma

Cover

2

Cover

CED

2

Cover

Non-small cell lung

Cover

Cover

Cover

CED

Cover

Cover

Ovary

CED

CED

CED

CED

Cover

CED

Pancreas

CED

CED

CED

CED

Cover

CED

Prostate

CED

CED

CED

CED

N/C

CED

Small cell lung

CED

CED

CED

CED

Cover

CED

Soft Tissue Sarcoma

CED

CED

CED

CED

Cover

CED

Thyroid

CED

CED

3

CED

Cover

3

Testes

CED

CED

CED

CED

Cover

CED

All other solid tumors

CED

CED

CED

CED

Cover

CED

* Formerly “diagnosis” and “staging”
** Formerly “restaging” and “monitoring response to treatment when a change in treatment is anticipated”
N/C = noncover
(1) Breast: Covered for initial staging of metastatic disease. Noncovered for initial staging of axillary lymph nodes.
(2) Melanoma: Noncovered for initial staging of regional lymph nodes
(3) Thyroid: Covered for restaging of follicular cell types

To review the full report click
(http://www1.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewdraftdecisionmemo.asp?from2=viewdraftdecisionmemo.asp&id=218&)




November 20, 2008

NOPR Update: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scans Found to Play Significant Role in Altering Cancer Patients’ Treatment Plan

Physicians participating in the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) reported changing the treatment plan for 43.1 % of their patients undergoing cancer treatment as the result of information gained from a PET scan. Data were analyzed for PET scans performed through the NOPR program specifically for monitoring cancer therapy. According to results published online November 17 in the journal Cancer (see
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121520044/abstract), the major changes physicians made in the intended management of their cancer patients as a result of the PET scan included: 1) changing to another chemotherapy agent, 2) changing the mode of therapy, or 3) changing the current dose or duration of therapy.

Currently, PET imaging is not considered the standard of care for monitoring the affects of cancer therapy and, therefore, is not paid for by most insurance companies. However, under Medicare’s NOPR program launched in May 2006, the agency began paying for PET (and PET integrated with computed tomography) scans for the purpose of cancer treatment monitoring.

Study data were analyzed for 8,240 patients who had 10,497 treatment-monitoring PET scans performed at 946 imaging centers to monitor chemotherapy alone (82% of scans), radiation therapy alone (6% of scans), or combined chemo-radiation therapy (12% of scans). The authors reported the treating physicians altered their patients’ intended care by switching to another chemotherapy agent as a result of approximately 26.5% of the PET scans performed and were prompted to adjust the dose or duration of treatment as a result of approximately 16.5% of the scans performed.

Overall, the treating physician judged the patient’s prognosis as a result of the PET scan was better or improved for 42.1% of scans, unchanged for 31.5% of scans, and worse for 26.4% of scans. “The referring physician’s assessment of prognosis in light of the PET findings was associated strongly with changes in the management”, said Bruce Hillner, M.D., lead author for the study and professor and eminent university scholar in the Department of Internal Medicine at Virginia Commonwealth University. “We also learned that these modifications occur predominantly after scans in which PET demonstrates more extensive disease than what was anticipated.”

Co-author Barry Siegel, MD, professor of radiology and chief of the Division of Nuclear Medicine at Washington University’s Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, commented, “Using PET to monitor cancer treatment appears to have broad benefit as we found that the change in a patient’s intended treatment didn’t significantly differ for those patients whose scans indicated local and regional disease versus those with metastatic disease.”

Previous published NOPR studies, reported physicians changed the intended care of more than one in three cancer patients as a result of a PET scan performed for the purpose of cancer diagnosis, staging, restaging and recurrence and that these changes are consistent across cancer types and reasons for ordering the exam.

The NOPR was established in response to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) novel “Coverage with Evidence” policy to collect data through a clinical registry to inform the center’s FDG-PET coverage determination decisions for currently non-covered cancer indications. The project is sponsored by the Academy of Molecular Imaging (AMI) and managed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the ACR Imaging Network (ACRIN). For more information about the NOPR, go to www.cancerPETregistry.org.




November 10, 2008

NOPR Update: PET Impact Found to be Consistent across Cancer Types and Imaging Indications

Information provided by positron emission tomography (PET) was found to affect how clinicians manage their cancer patients’ care regardless of the cancer type and reason for ordering this imaging scan, according to results from the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR), published online November 7 in the Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

Earlier this year, the study authors reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology aggregate data contributed to the NOPR during year one of operation that demonstrated clinicians changed the intended care of more than one in three cancer patients as the result of PET scan findings.

After two years of operation, with nearly twice the data for analysis, the authors found the impact of PET to be strikingly consistent for a wide range of cancers and indications.

For this follow on NOPR study, researchers analyzed data for 40,863 PET studies performed at 1,368 facilities participating in the NOPR nationwide during the registry’s first two years of operation. The impact of PET was assessed for 18 cancer types in patients with pathologically confirmed cancer and for indication for testing that included initial cancer staging (14,365 scans), restaging (14,584 scans), or detection of suspected cancer recurrence (11,914 scans).

“For the purposes of guiding clinical practice and shaping coverage policy, it is important to determine the relative effects of PET for different cancer types and indications for testing,” said Bruce Hillner, M.D., lead author for the study and professor and eminent university scholar in the Department of Internal Medicine at Virginia Commonwealth University. “These results strongly indicate the utility of PET for managing cancer patient care across a broad spectrum of cancer types and imaging indications.”

The NOPR was launched in May 2006 in response to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) novel “Coverage with Evidence” policy to collect data through a clinical registry to inform the center’s FDG-PET coverage determination decisions for currently non-covered cancer indications. The project is sponsored by the Academy of Molecular Imaging (AMI) and managed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the ACR Imaging Network (ACRIN). For more information about the NOPR, go to
www.cancerPETregistry.org.

The article is available at: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/49/12/1928.




July 24, 2008

NOPR Update: Denial of Claims with the Q0 Modifier

As previously announced, the NOPR investigators and staff have received reports that NOPR claims using the newly implemented Q0 (zero) modifier are reportedly being denied by some carriers incorrectly because the CMS-1500 claim form does not include an eight-digit clinical trial number or Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) number in item 23 of the claim form.

The NOPR investigators have now learned that providers who submitted some of the denied claims have incorrectly included information (e.g., “NOPR”) in item 23 of the CMS-1500 form or its electronic equivalent. This apparently has resulted in the claims being denied. If you have claims denied for this reason the claims can be corrected and resubmitted.

All NOPR claims should be billed with the Q0 (zero) modifier. Do not place any additional information in item 23 of the CMS-1500 form or its electronic equivalent when billing NOPR claims. This field already has several uses, including billing Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) numbers on claims that require an IDE number. Adding information to this field for NOPR services billed with the Q0 (zero) modifier may result in incorrect denial of claims. The Q0 (zero) modifier is also used on IDE claims as well as for other investigational services.

To determine when item 23 information needs to be included on your claim, you can visit the CMS website (
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/downloads/clm104c26.pdf) and go to pages 13-14.

Additional information should be placed in item 19 or its electronic equivalent.

Related Items:

CMS Posts Instructions for NOPR QR Deletion – Effective January 1, 2008 Use Q0 (zero)
http://interactive.snm.org/index.cfm?PageID=7259&RPID=277&Archive=1




July 21, 2008

NOPR Update: CMS Convenes MedCAC Panel

On March 25, 2008, The NOPR Working Group submitted a formal request to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), asking that it reconsider the current National Coverage decision on FDG-PET, provide coverage for diagnosis, staging and restaging for all cancers, end the data collection requirements for these indications. The NOPR Working Group further requested that the registry continue to collect data for treatment monitoring PET studies.

On April 10, 2008, CMS initiated its review of this request and has convened a Medicare Evidence Development and Coverage Advisory Committee (MedCAC) panel that will meet in Baltimore on August 20, 2008.

For additional information about the MedCAC panel meeting see https://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewtrackingsheet.asp?id=218.




July 14, 2008

NOPR Update: Denial of Claims with the Q0 Modifier

On Friday January 18, 2008, CMS released Transmittal R1418CP, CR 5805 notifying PET facilities and Medicare Administrator Contractors that the discontinued QR (and QA) HCPCS modifiers are replaced by the new modifier Q0 (zero) to identify investigational and routine clinical services provided in a clinical research study approved by Medicare.

Specifically, effective for dates of service (DOS) on or after January 1, 2008, modifier QR currently used in the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) is replaced with modifier Q0 (Zero). Additionally, QA is also replaced by Q0.

Please be advised that the NOPR investigators and staff have received reports from participating PET facilities that NOPR claims using the newly implemented Q0 (Zero) modifier may be denied because the CMS 1500 claim form does not include an eight-digit clinical trial number or Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) number in item 23 of the claim form.

    The Medicare Monthly Review MMR 2008-2, page 71-73 states; NOTE: If a Category A or B investigational device is used on the clinical trial, providers should continue to include the Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) in item 23 of the CMS 1500 claim form or the electronic equivalent. Also, your Medicare contractor will validate the IDE# number when it appears on the claim with the Q0 modifier and if the IDE# does not meet validation criteria, the claim will be returned as unprocessable.
The NOPR investigators and staff have communicated with the several of the Medicare medical review contractors to resolve this confusion and delayed claims processing. The issue arises because of the dual use of the Q0 modifier for both NOPR claims and registered clinical trial/investigational device claims. Most of the contractors have resolved this issue, however we continue to hear reports of denied claims because of the missing clinical trial number or Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) number.

In an attempt to assist participating PET facilities, consultants to the NOPR have recommended that sites participating in NOPR take the following actions if denials occur for this reason:

Contact your Medicare Customer Service Contact Center; inform the customer service representative (1) that this is a NOPR patient claim, and not a claim related to a registered clinical trial or an investigational device under an IDE, and (2) that, therefore there is NO number to report to the contractor for item 23 of the CMS 1500 claim form. If necessary send the link to the NOPR web site (www.cancerpetregistry.org) to the customer service representative.

If your issues remain unresolved after discussion with the customer service representative, please be sure to obtain the name of the customer service representative, and record the the date and time you called. Then send your facility name, the Medicare Contractor, the State, the name of the customer service representative, and the contact date and time to NOPR staff by e-mail at pet_registry@phila.acr.org, and we will try to assist you in the resolution of the issue.




April 9, 2008

NOPR Billing Alert: Q0 Modifier Operational

As previously announced, claims with a DOS after January 1, 2008 must be coded with the Q0 modifier. The implementation date for providers was April 7th so facilities may now submit their claims to their providers.

On Friday January 18, 2008, CMS released Transmittal R1418CP, CR 5805 notifying PET facilities and Medicare Administrator Contractors that the discontinued QR (and QA) and QV HCPCS modifiers are replaced by the new modifiers Q0 (zero) and Q1, respectively, to identify investigational and routine clinical services provided in a clinical research study approved by Medicare. These two new modifiers are included in the 2008 Annual HCPCS Level II Update.

Specifically, effective for dates of service (DOS) on or after January 1, 2008, modifier QR currently used in the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) is replaced with modifier Q0 (Zero). Additionally, QA is also replaced by Q0 and QV is replaced by Q1. CMS gave the contractors until April 7, 2008 to implement these changes.

Claims with a DOS prior to January 1, 2008 should continue to be submitted with the QR modifier.




March 23, 2008

NOPR Update: NOPR Confirms that FDG-PET Has Major Impact on Cancer Patient Management

National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) Data Confirm FDG-PET Has Major Impact on Management of Cancer Patient Care

Philadelphia - Clinicians changed the intended care of more than one in three cancer patients as the result of FDG-PET scan findings, according to a study of data from the National Oncologic PET Registry, published online March 24 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) (see http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/reprint/JCO.2007.14.5631v1 and the acconpanying editorial at http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/reprint/JCO.2007.15.6935v1).

[The NOPR article and the accompanying editorial were published in the print edition of JCO on May 1, 2008; see http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/13/2155 and http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/full/26/13/2083, respectively.]

The study analyzed data regarding nearly 23,000 patients contributed to the NOPR by more than 1200 facilities nationwide providing positron emission tomography (PET) scans.

"The NOPR working group sought to measure the impact of PET findings on patient management in a manner minimally intrusive to care providers. This was critical for successfully collecting the large amount of data required for a robust analysis," said Bruce Hillner, M.D., lead author for the study and professor and eminent university scholar in the Department of Internal Medicine at Virginia Commonwealth University.

Sponsored by the Academy of Molecular Imaging (AMI) and managed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the ACR Imaging Network (ACRIN), the NOPR was designed to collect questionnaire data from referring physicians on intended patient management before and after a FDG-PET scan

The NOPR participating PET facility collects from referring physicians both a pre-PET questionnaire (documenting study indication, cancer type and anticipated stage, and planned management if PET were not available) and one of several post-PET questionnaires that assess the referring physician's planned management in light of the FDG-PET findings.

Analysis of data collected found that FDG-PET is associated with a 36.5% change in the decision of whether or how to treat a patient's cancer. NOPR working group co-chair R. Edward Coleman, MD, professor of radiology and chief of the Division of Nuclear Medicine at Duke University School of Medicine and an AMI founding member, comments, "We were especially surprised by the impact of the PET findings on patients who were originally planned to have a biopsy. The procedure was avoided in approximately three-quarters of these patients."

The NOPR was launched in May 2006 in response to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) novel "Coverage with Evidence Development" policy to collect data through a clinical registry to inform the center's FDG-PET coverage determination decisions for currently non-covered cancer indications.

Cancer types Medicare currently covers for reimbursement only through the NOPR include those of the ovary, uterus, prostate, pancreas, stomach, kidney and bladder. (For a complete list of NOPR covered cancer types and indications, go to the Indications Page.)

Oncologist and NOPR working group co-chair, Anthony Shields, MD, professor of medicine and oncology at the Karmanos Cancer Institute at Wayne State University and chair of ACRIN's Oncology Committee says of the research results, "These results confirm what we suspected from increasing experience with PET. However, we lacked the significant data required to prove the benefit of PET for many uncovered indications. It's very encouraging that oncologists and other clinicians may have access to the valuable information PET affords for ensuring the best patient care."

NOPR has formally asked CMS to reconsider the current National Coverage decision on FDG-PET and to end the data collection requirements for diagnosis, staging and restaging. Medicare will review the published data and determine the next steps related to reimbursement for PET scans now only covered through the NOPR. Barry Siegel, MD, FACR, professor of radiology and chief of the Division of Nuclear Medicine at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology at Washington University and chair of ACRIN's PET Imaging Core Laboratory, also serves as an NOPR working group co-chair. "Based on these data, Medicare should strongly consider opening up the coverage to include diagnosis, staging and restaging for all cancers, states Dr Siegel."

The ACR and ACRIN worked to develop the NOPR in collaboration with registry sponsor, the Academy for Molecular Imaging since CMS announced its intent to support a PET registry in January 2005. The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the Society for Nuclear Medicine also have played key roles in guiding the project's development.




February 29, 2008

NOPR Billing Alert: CMS Posts Instructions Regarding Deletion of QR Modifier used for NOPR Claims - Effective January 1, 2008 Use Q0 Modifier

On Friday January 18, 2008, CMS released Transmittal R1418CP, CR 5805 notifying PET facilities and Medicare Administrator Contractors that the discontinued QR (and QA) and QV HCPCS modifiers are replaced by the new modifiers Q0 (zero) and Q1, respectively, to identify investigational and routine clinical services provided in a clinical research study approved by Medicare. These two new modifiers are included in the 2008 Annual HCPCS Level II Update. The CR 5805 instructions are to be implemented by the Medicare Contractors no later than April 7, 2008.

Specifically, effective for dates of service (DOS) on or after January 1, 2008, modifier QR currently used in the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) is replaced with modifier Q0 (Zero). Additionally, QA is also replaced by Q0 and QV is replaced by Q1. CMS has given the contractors until April 7, 2008 to implement these changes; however, we anticipate that some contractors might be ready to accept these claims sooner. PET facilities are encouraged to update their charge-masters to include theses new modifiers. While all contractors are required to accept claims with the new modifiers as of April 7th, facilities are advised to check with their local contractors to ascertain the exact date the contractors' systems will be ready to process claims.

Claims with a DOS prior to January 1, 2008 should continue to be submitted with the QR modifier.

The NOPR investigators and staff are fully aware that participating PET facilities are understandably distressed by CMS' announcement late in 2007 that the QR modifier was being eliminated at the end of the year and that the new modifier would not be implemented until early in April 2008. We have expressed our concerns to CMS, but unfortunately that is all we could do, as these changes were entirely beyond our control.




December 31, 2007

NOPR BILLING ALERT - QR Modifier Deleted Effective 2008

The QR modifier used in conjunction with CPT and HCPCS codes to submit NOPR claims on the Medicare billing forms is deleted as of January 1, 2008. If you submit the QR modifier on or after January 1, 2008, your claims may reject. Additionally, following HIPPA rules, providers are required to use accurate coding for that date of service. CMS has not published the new billing instructions yet; therefore, PET facilities may want to consider holding NOPR claims until the CMS instructions are available. We will post the new information as soon as it is publicly available. We will also send out an alert once the transmittal is posted.




November 03, 2007

NOPR Update: Design & Analysis Plan Paper Published

The design and analysis plan of the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) has been published in the November 1st issue of the Journal of Nuclear Medicine. It is available at: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/48/11/1901?etoc.

The paper, "The National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR): Design and Analysis Plan," provides insight into the NOPR's development, workflow, and statistical design. It also details how the data collected by the over 1600 participating PET facilities will be evaluated and reported to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS).




November 2, 2007

NOPR Update: Covered Indications

On August 23, 2006, the NOPR investigators reported that we had noted a number of studies included in the NOPR for which the type of cancer and the indication for the PET scan potentially should be covered by Medicare outside of the conditions of the registry. Nearly 4% of studies reported to the NOPR met these criteria at that time, and the types of problems encountered were reviewed in detail (see 8/15/07 News entry). We have continued to monitor the frequency of such cases in the NOPR and are still finding that such cases are being included, with relatively little change in the frequency since our prior notification

From a practical point of view, the results of our continued monitoring suggest that PET facilities still need to carefully review all clinical requests for PET in Medicare patients to determine whether the study is routinely covered or covered only under NOPR. Ultimately, it is up to the PET facility to make certain that it is submitting correct claims to Medicare. Please note that patients should not be registered in the NOPR for a covered indication because the ICD-9 code provided by the referring physician does not support medical necessity per the carrier's local coverage determination. [One recent example that has come to our attention is the denial of claims, by one carrier, submitted with ICD-9 codes 202.90 - 202.98 ("other and unspecified malignant neoplasms of lymphoid and histocytic tissue") for PET or PET/CT for lymphoma staging or restaging. Our advice in such cases is to check with the referring physician to determine whether a more precise ICD-9 code can be provided based on the pathologic classification of the lymphoma.] Such studies can be performed, and the claim appealed for medical necessity if it is rejected. If it is consistent with your facility's policy, patients can be asked to sign an Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) under these circumstances.

Additionally, we are aware that some carriers have imposed frequency limitations for certain PET or PET/CT studies done for covered indications. Registering patients who have exceeded the established frequency edits/limitations in the NOPR is not an appropriate way to overcome these frequency limitations. Review your local carrier's guidelines for the appropriate way to appeal these claim denials. Again, such patients can be requested to sign an ABN.

Please contact the NOPR investigators or staff at pet_registry@phila.acr.org if you would like further clarification of any of the issues addressed in this announcement.




September 20, 2007

NOPR Update: Referring Physician's Responsibilities for NOPR Participation

Under the terms of the CMS Coverage Policy for oncologic indications included in the NOPR, a beneficiary's PET study is eligible for CMS reimbursement only if the Pre-PET Form is completed and returned to the PET facility prior to the PET scan and the Post-PET Form is completed and returned within 30 days of the PET scan. The data collection forms consist of approximately 5 questions regarding the beneficiary's planned management and must be completed by the beneficiary's referring physician.

The obligations for the referring physician are found in the NOPR Operations Manual and Frequently Asked Questions section (see http://www.cancerpetregistry.org/clinicians.htm). In order to ensure the accuracy of the NOPR data, the referring physician has the obligation to provide the answer to the intended management question and review any responses prepared by ancillary personnel. The PET Forms can be returned to the PET facility via FAX, mail, or hand delivery with all entries completed and verified.

The Pre- and Post-PET Forms properly completed by the beneficiary's referring physician represent the critical data being collected by the NOPR, and failure to meet this obligation will jeopardize the quality of the data collected by the NOPR. Please direct any questions concerning this statement of referring physician responsibilities to NOPR staff by email at pet.registry@phila.acr.org or by calling (215) 717-0859.




August 15, 2007

NOPR Update: NOPR RSNA 2007 Presentations

NOPR Presentations at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).


The initial results of the NOPR will be presented by Dr. Bruce Hillner in an RSNA scientific session on Sunday, November 25. 2007. In that same session Dr. R. Edward Coleman will present an overview of the NOPR and its data collection methods.
Date: Sunday November 25
Session Time: 10:45 - 12:15 PM;
Room: E353C
In addition, Dr. Barry Siegel will present an update on NOPR activities on Tuesday November 27, 2007 as part of the "RSNA Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology: Clinical PET and PET/CT Imaging". Those interested in this presentation should register for RSNA Refresher Course RC411."




May 24, 2007

NOPR Update: IMPORTANT NOTICE - Recording of the Region Scanned on the PET Completion From

In December 2006, the data collection procedures of the NOPR were changed to allow us to capture more information about the PET imaging procedure. Specifically, after that date, PET facilities were required to note on the PET completion form which one of the following characterized the study performed:
  1. body PET or PET/CT only (examination billed with one CPT code in the range from 78811 through 78816);
  2. dedicated brain PET only (examination billed with CPT code 78608); or
  3. body PET or PET/CT AND dedicated brain PET (examination billed with one CPT code in the range from 78811 through 78816 AND with CPT code 78608).
The purpose of this additional data collection was to allow us to identify those cases in which brain PET was performed, so that we could analyze the impact of PET brain imaging on management of cancer patients.

After the institution of this new data collection requirement, we found that the frequency of these three options was as follows: (1) body only - 92%; (2) brain only - 1%; and (3) brain + body -7%. The frequency in this latter category was considerably higher than we had expected, given the rather narrow circumstances under which combined body and brain PET imaging is indicated for patient management (see the guidance provided by the Society of Nuclear Medicine Coding and Reimbursement Committee at http://interactive.snm.org/index.cfm?PageID=5408&RPID= 1995).

To better understand how we would analyze the data in the third group (and to understand why this combination was occurring so frequently), we did a review of a random sample of the pre-PET forms and the PET reports of 53 patients said to have had both body and brain PET. We found that none of the reports described an indication for dedicated brain PET imaging. Moreover, the descriptions of the technique of the PET studies suggested that nearly all of the examinations were either skull-thigh body imaging (with extension of the scan field to the skull vertex) or whole-body imaging (vertex to toes). In fact, not a single report clearly described that a separate, dedicated brain acquisition was performed. If a dedicated brain PET study were done, this generally would be expected to be documented in the report, because of different patient preparation (uptake phase in a quiet dimly lit room), longer imaging time (typically 5-15 minutes for 3D and 20-30 minutes for 2D acquisition) usually with smaller pixel size (zoom), and different interpretation strategies for cancer indications (e.g., comparison or fusion with brain MRI).

Our findings suggest that one or more of the following problems may be occurring. Suggested corrections are noted, as well.
  • The individuals responsible for data entry at some PET facilities are answering this question on the Pre-PET Form incorrectly. We believe this is the most likely explanation in most of these cases. Accordingly, we request that staff at each PET facility review the procedures they are using to determine what specific PET procedures have actually been performed and will be billed to Medicare. In addition, we will be adding some further instructions about this on the PET Completion Form.
  • The dedicated brain PET studies were reported separately from the body PET studies, but only the body PET reports were uploaded to the NOPR database. We think this is unlikely based on the reports reviewed. However, we are requesting that PET facilities upload both brain and body reports when both have been performed. We will add a reminder to this effect on the Web screen for PET Report Submission Form.
  • The studies have been coded and billed incorrectly, e.g. the study was billed with CPT codes 78815 and 78608 when only billing for 78815 was justified based on the request from the referring physician and/or the technical details of the study performed and interpreted. If this is the case, it could present a compliance problem for the PET facility. Accordingly, we encourage staff at participating PET facilities to review their billing processes and the criteria they use to determine when to bill for dedicated brain PET. We further suggest that PET facilities forward a copy of this notice to individuals responsible for billing and compliance (and to the corresponding individuals in the physician practice, if professional-component billing is performed separately).
Finally, we are requesting that all participating PET facilities provide the NOPR with corrected information for any of the cases that were incorrectly designated as combined body/brain studies. This will need to done for the period since we began collecting this data on December 16, 2006 until the present. Specifically, if a case entry was designated as "Both Brain and Body PET" and should have correctly been designated as "Body PET", we are requesting that you send an email message to Sharon Hartson (shartson@phila.acr.org) with the following information:
  • your facility name;
  • your facility number; and
  • he case ID number(s) needing to be corrected.
If you are unable to identify cases that were coded incorrectly at your facility, you may send a request to Ms. Hartson, and she will send you a listing of all cases at your facility designated as "Both Brain and Body PET".

We hope this information is useful, and appreciate your cooperation in helping us to obtain the most accurate possible data for the NOPR. The NOPR Working Group.




February 21, 2007

NOPR Update: Patient & Referring Physician Information Sheets

As is discussed in detail on the NOPR website (http://www.cancerpetregistry.org/pdf/nopr_regulatory.pdf), the only entity considered to be engaged in the research conducted by NOPR is the NOPR itself. The NOPR investigators and staff are aware that some PET facilities have elected to have their own institutional review boards or privacy offices review the NOPR before the facility participates, typically as a matter of institutional policy requiring such review. The official NOPR Patient and Referring Physician Information Sheets (available at http://www.cancerpetregistry.org/forms.htm) have been approved by American College of Radiology Institutional Review Board, and must be used as the primary vehicles for obtaining patient and referring physician consent for use of NOPR data for research purposes. Institutional consent documents cannot be substituted for the official NOPR forms. However, if necessary, an addendum to the official NOPR documents may be provided to patients and/or referring physicians to incorporate any specific institutional requirements. For further information or clarification regarding this policy, please contact NOPR staff at pet_registry@phila.acr.org.




January 31, 2007

NOPR Update: Coding the Cancer Type on the Pre-PET Form

New instructions have been added to the Pre-PET Form and a new version has been posted to the NOPR Web site. The instructions for question 2.a Cancer Type (ICD-9 Code) state:
a. Cancer Type (ICD-9 Code) - check the one cancer that most closely relates to the specific reason for the PET study indicated in response to Question 1. (Check only one)

Note: The three-digit ICD-9 codes included on this form are for purposes of identifying the cancer type in the NOPR database, but the one selected is not necessarily the one that should be used for claim submission.
The revised Pre-PET Form also now includes a list of the ICD-9 codes that the database will accept if the "Other" box is checked for question 2.a.
Acceptable responses are 159, 165, 173, 181, 184, 192, 194, 195, and 235-238
We hope that this alleviates some of the questions that have arisen regarding the proper coding of the cancer type ID for the NOPR Pre-PET Form.




December 15, 2006

NOPR Update: Change to PET Completion Form

The PET Completion Form has been revised to capture information about the region(s) scanned for the PET study.
  • New Question 3 added:
    • 3. Region(s) Scanned (you must check only one)
      • Body Only (CPT 78811-78816)
      • Brain Only (CPT 78608)
      • Both Body AND Brain (CPT 78811-78816 AND 78608)
  • Original Question 3 renumbered as Question 4 and original Question 4 renumbered as Question 5.





October 22, 2006

NOPR Update: Consistency in the Completion of Pre-PET Forms

The purpose of this announcement is to request that PET facilities participating in the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) routinely review their Pre-PET forms to ensure that the correct reason for the study has been selected. The rationale for this request is described below. If this review suggests that the reason selected might be incorrect, please contact the referring physician or his/her staff to verify that the response to this important question on the Pre-PET form is correct. A quality assessment review of initial data submitted to the NOPR has identified inconsistencies in the completion of the Pre-PET forms with regard to the responses to one of the questions on the Pre-PET Form. This question (Question 1) asks for the specific reason for the PET or PET/CT study; the reasons are listed below:
  • Diagnosis: To determine if a suspicious lesion is cancer
  • Diagnosis/Unknown Primary Tumor: To detect a primary tumor site in a patient with a confirmed or strongly suspected metastatic lesion
  • Diagnosis/Paraneoplastic: To detect a primary tumor site in a patient with a presumed paraneoplastic syndrome
  • Initial Staging of histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed cancer
  • Monitoring Treatment Response during treatment
  • Restaging after completion of therapy
  • Suspected Recurrence of a previously treated cancer
The most common error that we have identified is the selection of the "Diagnosis: To determine if a suspicious lesion is cancer" response on the Pre-PET Form, when the clinical PET report clearly shows that one of the other reasons is more likely. We believe that the inconsistency in selecting the appropriate response to this question occurs due to the incorrect assumption that since PET is a diagnostic test, the PET or PET/CT study is being performed for "diagnosis." The "Diagnosis: To determine if a suspicious lesion is cancer" response should be used ONLY for the initial diagnosis of a suspected cancer, and NOT for detection of a recurrence of a known cancer. The latter reason should be marked on the Pre-PET Form as "Suspected Recurrence of a previously treated cancer." Note that the Pre-PET form was recently modified to provide better definitions of the specific reasons for which PET examinations are requested. We anticipate this will help to reduce the frequency of these errors, but also request this review of submitted forms by participating PET facilities. If the correct reason for the study is not provided in Question 1, the evaluation of the NOPR data may result in incorrect conclusions about the impact of PET and PET/CT on patient management.

Thank you for your continuing support and interest in making NOPR a success.




October 7, 2006

NOPR Update: Changes to the PET Completion and PET Report Submission Forms and E-mail Reminders
  • The PET Completion and the PET Report Submission Forms have been changed. The question asking the name of the interpreting radiologist has been moved from the PET Completion Form to the PET Report Submission Form. This change is intended to prevent delays in the submission of the PET Completion Form when the name of the interpreting radiologist is not known until the PET report is completed.
  • As a further aid to the timely submission of time-critical data, due dates for future form submissions have been added to several of the e-mail reminders.
    • Pre-PET Form Submission Confirmation - the due date for the PET Completion Form has been added to this e-mail.
    • PET Form Reminder - the due date for the PET Completion Form has been added to this e-mail.
    • Post PET Form Reminder - the due date for the Post-PET Form has been added to this e-mail.





September 26, 2006

NOPR Update: Potential Limitations of FDG-PET for Cancers and Indications Covered by NOPR and Changes to the Indications Table

The following changes have been made to the NOPR Indications Table that is available on the NOPR Web site and in the NOPR Operations Manual, Appendix III:
  • A note concerning potential limitations of FDG-PET for cancers and indications covered by NOPR has been added:
    • IMPORTANT NOTE: The scientific evidence concerning the clinical utility of FDG-PET is generally less robust for cancers and indications that are currently covered by Medicare only in the NOPR than for cancers and indications that are currently covered without clinical data submission to the NOPR. For this reason, Medicare has conditioned coverage of FDG-PET under the NOPR on the collection of clinical data. These data will be used to help determine the clinical utility of FDG-PET for conditionally covered cancers and indications. The billing physician remains responsible for documenting medical necessity, which is required for the coding and billing of both covered and NOPR-eligible PET studies. Eligibility for the NOPR does not constitute a clinical management recommendation for the use of PET for the conditionally covered cancers and indications, by either the Medicare program or NOPR investigators. Referring and interpreting physicians are thus advised to refer to the published literature to better understand the potential limitations of FDG-PET for NOPR-eligible uses.
  • The entry for Male Breast Cancer has been changed to reflect its eligibility for inclusion into the NOPR, which is identical to that for Female Breast Cancer.
  • The following footnote was added for Diagnosis of both Female and Male Breast Cancer:
    • PET is non-covered for "Diagnosis" of breast cancer to evaluate a suspicious breast mass. However, a patient with suspected breast cancer is eligible for entry in NOPR for the indications (1) "Diagnosis: Unknown Primary Site" in a patient with axillary nodal metastasis but no evident primary breast cancer by conventional evaluation and (2) "Diagnosis: Paraneoplastic Syndrome".
  • A footnote was added for Anal Cancer eligibility:
    • Some Medicare carriers include anal cancer in their coverage of "colorectal cancer"; for PET facilities served by those carriers, PET for anal cancer diagnosis, initial staging, or restaging/suspected recurrence would be a covered indication.
  • A General Note was added:
    • GENERAL NOTE: PET imaging of the brain with CPT code 78608 for diagnosis, initial staging, treatment monitoring, or restaging/suspected recurrence of any type of cancer is covered only under NOPR.





September 13, 2006

NOPR Update: Empire Resolves NOPR Claims Processing Problems

The Society for Nuclear Medicine (SMN) has published information regarding the resolution of NOPR claims denials (QR modifier issues) for Empire CMS contractors on their Web site. For more information please go to: http://interactive.snm.org/index.cfm?PageID=5507&RPID=10.




September 12, 2006

NOPR Update: Patient Charges

NOPR has received reports of PET facilities charging patients for the $50 per-case NOPR registration fee at the time of the PET scan. This practice is inconsistent with the NOPR registration requirements set forth in the Operations Manual, and with the statute and regulations governing the administration of the NOPR.

Neither the NOPR Operations Manual, the January 2005 CMS National Coverage Determination announcing the NOPR, nor the statute and regulations governing the Medicare program, authorizes providers to charge the $50 per case registration fee to the Medicare beneficiaries participating in the NOPR. The Medicare statute provides that the program will pay 80% of the reasonable charges for covered services, and establishes a beneficiary copayment of 20%. The NOPR Operations Manual provides that facilities themselves shall pay the $50 per case fee through an escrow account established with the NOPR. CMS and NOPR administrators expect that facilities will bear this expense as a routine cost of doing business, and will not pass the charge on to patients.




September 8, 2006

NOPR Update: Changes to the Web Application

Several changes to the NOPR Web application will be implemented on Saturday, September 9th. The major changes are detailed below.
  • Case Registration Form - Scan Date - You will once again be able to enter the correct date if the scan date is the date of case entry.
  • Pre-PET Form - the ICD-9 code must be entered for all patients' whose cancer type (question 2a and 2c) is entered as "Other, or not listed." This was explained in greater detail in the NOPR Update of September 1, 2006 and the reminder sent on September 5, 2006.
  • PET R